It seems that perceptions of early Victorians as strictly polite and unwaveringly sophisticated people may have been untrue. In his Islander article “Theatre Patrons of the 1880s Who Would Never Be Missed Wore Big Hats, Talked To Much”, historian James K. Nesbitt shares excerpts from a an article published in the Daily Colonist that scathingly rebukes impolite Victorian theatre goers.
From January of 1886; first, a rather lengthy introductory paragraph:
“Bald heads come in for a large share of ridicule because they will occupy the front seats at the ballet and comic opera, but they are a nuisance to no one, for they only allow of a better view for those who are seated behind them. Besides, a long list of precedents has been established their right to the occupation of the orchestra chairs, and custom has always recognized that they were they to desert their rightful place at the temple of amusement and occupy promiscuous seats, actors, actresses and audience would feel their was something lacking in the house. By all mean let the gentle men who posses no capillary covering retain their recognized places without comment or dissent.
There are several very apparent nuisances at the splendid new Victoria Theatre, however, and while sitting in a back seat dress circle at The Beggar Student, a scribe of The Colonist was very aware of a number of people who would “never be missed” if the y remained away.
The first noted immediately in front of him – two ladies with brightly arranged hair, surmounted with bonnets of outrageous proportions, trimmed with birds, and flowers. These precluded a view of the performers on the stage and it was only by twisting ones neck this way, and then the other, that a view was obtained of the pretty scene, the ladies dodging around in an aggravating way. If they would only leave their high hats at home, and wear to the opera a wool fascinator of the beautiful shades that are now made over their heads they would look more attractive themselves, and confer a boon on an exasperated backseat audience.”
And that was not all, apparently, big hats were not even the biggest problem
“there are people in this 24 year old city of Victoria who imagine that life is altogether of a duration to brief to furnish them with sufficient opportunities to of telling their friends all they know, Heaven only knows that if they considered the wisdom of their speech they would forever be quiet.
There were some of these intolerable pests in the immediate neighbourhood of the scribe, and during the finer parts of the performance, when every one with a soul for music was straining to catch the charm of the sweet sounds, they would break out with some loud remark more than sufficient to destroy the harmony of the song, and the temper of the listeners. They certainly would bee gladly “missed.”
the list of offences carried on
“but there are others – there is the man who must go out between every act for cloves, brushing past those who have enough common sense and decency to remain in their chairs, tramping on their corns, and perhaps leering at the ladies. They invariably take a centre seat, so that they can create as much trouble as possible for others.
There is the individual who cannot wait until the finish of a song before applauding, there is the noodle who will persist during the progress of a play in telling all he knows about it to his neighbours, or anticipating scenes; there is the awful crying baby who should always be left at home, there is the usher who will take the longest way to get to a seat, or who will place people in the wrong seats.”
The humble scribe of The Colonist left his readers with a final admonition.
“Theatre and concert etiquette should certainly be better observed in Victoria than it is at present.”























